For years I [Jose Antonio Caravaca] have defined the cause of the UFO close encounters, and other anomalies faced by humans, as an "external agent", in clear allusion to the fact that the triggering factor of these experiences was exogenous to the witness and of unknown origin.
However, it was clear from my studies a quite important and disconcerting aspect was clear: that the involvement of the human psyche was very much present in these contacts, and that probably the participation of the observers delimited many of the visual aspects contained in the encounters.
Therefore, the witness ceased to be a mere chronicler and became, almost as if by magic, a co-creator and interpreter of these unusual experiences. In this way, a close connection was born between this mysterious "external agent" and the observers' psyche, in a fluid and intimate "communication" that was fed back by human concepts to insert them into the "spatial" and "technological" scenery that was shaped, in the form of projection, before the eyes of the witnesses. Despite this, the identity of this unknown operator was always in the mist of mystery... a control system? an extraterrestrial civilization? beings of other dimensions?
My studies have shown that the intelligence involved in close encounters with UFOs is very basic, and that this "external agent" is probably not intended to communicate or convey any type of philosophical, technological, spiritual, etc. message that is totally unknown to human beings. We always find ourselves in a delicate "frontier" where the supposed knowledge that comes from the hereafter, in any of its meanings (extraterrestrial, celestial, supernatural, etc.), does not cease to be "distortions" of human information exposed and introduced in a supposedly transcendental paraphernalia.
The visual has always prevailed over the intellectual content of these experiences. The scenography has always been superior to the "screenplay" that history tells us. The information provided by unknown entities has never provided any clarification as to its origin or intentions. And all this has made me think that the "external agent" seems to act as Carl Jung's "collective unconscious", above any other approach put forward by UFO researchers over the years. And I am convinced of this, because close encounters with UFOs are closer to the omnibulous dream universe and mystical experiences than anything else. Since this type of "vision" is unique in nature, linking it to the witness in such an intimate and personal way, it cannot be overlooked.
In addition, the nucleus of UFO literature is replete with incidents that never happen again anywhere else in the world. And this indicates that the answers to this enigma are closer to the observer than we have hitherto sensed. But after years of analysis of the complex ufological casuistry, I have determined that this "external agent" may be an indication of the existence of a psychic "entity" unknown until now, and which I have defined as "collective consciousness".
It is quite possible that the collective unconscious, with all its obvious potential, has suffered a demerger to give rise to a kind of "collective consciousness" which, with its own intelligence and modus operandi, can sometimes communicate with people. Collective consciousness produces uncontrolled "psychedelic algorithms" whose purpose is "subjective" communication with the human psyche. Its logic and staging, like any mental process, may be beyond our present understanding and its purpose may be to expose a new conception of reality, thought, ideas, creativity, etc.
This "collective consciousness" is probably the cause of a wide range of unknown psychic perceptions and alterations (including several catalogued as psychic diseases), some of which may be very far removed from what we generically call the universe of anomalies. This "collective consciousness" is a "switch" that individually connects witnesses to a vast psychic dimension, where knowledge, creativity, and even clairvoyance seem to have no limits, and depending on the potential of each observer, is able to develop different ways of interacting with people and the environment. In this way we complete the circle.
The human psyche has produced the collective unconscious and somehow it has become detached, in a not at all strange psychic process, into a new "entity" that, in certain circumstances, connects with witnesses in a loop that has been persecuting humanity for centuries.
JOSE ANTONIO CARAV@CA