sábado, 3 de febrero de 2018
THE UFO PHENOMENON IS NEUTRAL: Basic differences with the theoretical model proposed by Vallée or Keel
Under our ideas, the UFO phenomenon would be totally neutral towards us, both in intentionality and in the alleged information transferred to witnesses.If we are in the presence of a psychological phenomenon, although of unknown origin, incited by an unidentified external agent that "connects" with our psyche, it is very likely that all the information (visual and verbal) received in UFO encounters has a human origin.We are confronted with a phenomenon of "feedback", where all unconscious contents (used for the elaboration of an extraterrestrial false landing), are presented in a distorted projection, so that they do not appear to be of mental origin.
Therefore, the messages obtained from the alleged aliens, scientific, religious, social, philosophical, are only the product and result of a psychological mechanism of an external agent, which "edits" and "projects" them as if they were the result of extrahuman communication.Interestingly, these approaches can be adapted to all the supposed communications obtained from the "beyond" for centuries, which have never really contributed anything new to human ideology.
All the actions undertaken by the occupants of UFOs possess this same psychic origin.
The behaviour of "extraterrestrials" in their landing on land, is defined by the unconscious of witnesses, which determines that these occupants are: friendly, violent, communicative, evasive, etc..
This whole process is the product of a phenomenon similar to the one that originates in dreams, where the image and the archetype prevails over any other aspect.Therefore, we can conclude that the UFO phenomenon is essentially neutral, does not interfere in human activities, nor does it seek any other great hidden purpose.
Everything depends exclusively on the "intellectual" capacity of witnesses, who in the last instance are the only ones responsible for the transcendence that their contact may have.
JOSE ANTONIO CARAV@CA
Originally published UFO CONJECTURES here
jueves, 28 de diciembre de 2017
The UFO Close encounters are the result of a complex "psychological process" caused by an unidentified "external agent" which communicates/interaction with the psyche of witnesses. The result of this conjunction is the "creation" of a "fictitious" experience, by means of a "three-dimensional projection", to make the unsuspecting observers believe that they are witnessing the landing of an alien spacecraft and sometimes its crew. In fact, close encounters with UFOs would be closer to being an elaborate "psychic architecture" (with physical and tangible parts) than to a space exploration orchestrated by biological beings from outer space. Many internal gears put in place for the "elaboration" of these experiences/proyection are similar to the "dreamlike" processes, so most of these episodes contain a patina of unreality more characteristic of dreams than of an alien landing. Therefore, being "artificial" experiences, close encounters with UFOs are completely devoid of any "scientific" significance as it has been tried to establish to date, understood as being caused by "extraterrestrial" space aircraft. In the same way, it is meaningless to try to elaborate any kind of study or analysis of the morphology or behaviour of UFO crewmembers. Since nothing observed during these experiences has a physical permanence in our universe after the conclusion of the "encounter". Since this type of experiences are the consequence of a unique, unrepeatable and untransferable "mental" creative/artistic process, arising from the "exclusive communication" between the psyche of the observer (unconsciously) and an unknown external agent, who is ultimately responsible for capturing in a "holographic three-dimensional" projection the result of this "psychic conjunction", whose fruit is a supposed alien landing. Most of the elements staged; UFO's form, appearance of dress or behavior of humanoids, are no more than the result obtained by the "external agent" of distorting information enclosed in the unconscious of the witness (cinema, literature, hobbies, etc.). The interaction with this projection can be complete, since the "external agent" can grant to all or, to some of the elements of the scene, materiality, as if the "scenographic" set had a physical and tangible reality. This can lead to footprints, burns, damage, etc. in the sighting area. However, this is only a "collateral effect" of conferring matter to the "projection", with results, it must be said, that are also predictable from the point of view of the witness. Since all the traces and remains found after a UFO landing are predictable and accepted by the human imaginary as a spacecraft product. In fact, no unusual or truly foreign trace of human "space travel" has ever been found after a close encounter with UFOs (For example, after a UFO landing, all the land, rocks, vegetation, etc. was colored blue. Why hasn't this happened?because nobody imagines it compatible with the descent of an alien ship. However, it is more "logical" to leave oil stains, burns, metal remains, etc.)
This approach offers us a new conceptual framework that can explain the monumental and complicated structure of the ufological casuistry, which, to date, has escaped, evaded and eliminated any kind of rational scrutiny to which it has been subjected to clarify its nature or origin.
JOSE ANTONIO CARAV@CA
sábado, 28 de octubre de 2017
I, and many others, are celebrating the 100th anniversary of the famous "solar dance" that occurred in Fatima (Portugal) before thousands of astonished people. For decades, many researchers have been convinced that the strange phenomena narrated by the three humble Portuguese shepherds can be included within the UFO paradigm.
For these researchers there is no doubt that Fatima's Marian apparition was really a close encounter with an "extraterrestrial" ship misunderstood by a group of children who could scarcely even imagine the transcendence of their visions and that, in addition, for greater confusion, it was concealed and silenced by the Church, which presented before public opinion a sweetened image (read religious) of what had happened in that remote Portuguese region. And it is the updated review of the facts, with UFO casuistry in hand, allowed many ufologists to reinterpret the events of 1917 as the vision of a humanoid associated with unknown aerial phenomena (UFOs).
In addition, for greater certainty of his thoughts, the "dance of the sun" concealed the flight of a silver "disc" that frightened the good people unable to decipher what was presented before their noses.
However, I think it is a great mistake to believe that the UFO phenomenon encompasses the Marian apparitions and not the other way around. In fact, from my perspective, no anomalous paradigm prevails over another. What happened in Fatima is not synonymous, far from it, with an underground ufological episode. We are simply faced with the manifestation of an unknown phenomenon of psychic origin, which was transmuted as the witnesses themselves began to influence their interpretation. And only the combined faith of thousands of people, that is, the strong popular belief in these apparitions made possible the miracle of the Sun.
And today, we have done a little of the same thing that those little shepherds did, by "modifying" these manifestations under the umbrella of ufology. The phenomenon we are facing uses a series of highly malleable resources (appearance of entities, aerial phenomena, lights, etc.) that we modify ourselves to fit them into our belief system...
JOSE ANTONIO CARAV@CA
Originally published UFO CONJECTURES Here
Originally published UFO CONJECTURES Here
lunes, 1 de mayo de 2017
Despite what the profane reader may think of the ufological subjects, most of the UFO casuistry is plagued with "objetcs" that do not have to do with the famous flying saucers. And, in fact, almost any form of flying apparatus, no matter how absurd it may seem, and no matter how far from an aerodynamic line, has been observed flying our skies, proving that the phenomenon of the unidentified is much more complex than some would like.
And just as with the humanoid typology, almost infinite and impossible to classify, the "flying saucer" models are so many and different that it is highly unlikely that our hypothetical visitants extraterrestrials to have a variety of ships in their hangars. OR That we are being visited, as if our planet were a space zoo, by infinite alien civilitations... These anomalies are undoubtedly the sign of the existence of an unknown paradigm related to our psyche, which, although provoked and directed by an agent external to our mind, is capable of catalyzing and transforming our thoughts into a distorted "staging" of alien visitation. Is therefore "logical" that UFO literature is broad and divergent as broad and heterogeneous are the witnesses that present themselves and star in this phenomenon, mutable based on our intellectual wealth. Which is able to create a "holographic" projection an apparent reality, but ephemeral and fiction, about Ghosts apparitions, of the Virgin Mary or the Abominable Snowman.
And only on rare occasions, for reasons or conjunctions of elements and factors that we can not even venture, this type of experience acquires a momentary corporality to give the appearance of what is not and will never be ... a "reality" like we understand it.
Therefore, nothing of the perceived during this type of experiences has a physical continuity in our universe ... in the same way that the protagonists of a film do not continue the plot after it has finished to project the film ...
Definitely the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis has shipwrecked ...
JOSE ANTONIO CARAV@CA
domingo, 2 de abril de 2017
Let us try to explain what are the basic principles of the DISTORTION THEORY (DT). One of the main points to be clarified, before starting, is that DT does not defend that the UFO phenomenon has a purely psychological, sociological or hallucinatory origin, all contrary, it is PRODUCED, in the first instance, by the INTERACTION / COMMUNICATION OF AN EXTERNAL AGENT UNKNOWN (UAE), INTELLIGENT AND INDEPENDENT TO THE HUMAN BEING, with a witness that describing experiences with UFOs. To achieve its objectives, the EAU "CONNECTS" with the psyche of the observers to "extract", from the individual and exclusive unconscious of them, intellectual material (found in hobbies, culture, cinema, literature, etc.). The purpose of MANUFACTURING / PROJECTING an FICTION ALIEN VISITATION (for example, landing of a flying saucer and its occupants).
What exactly does the EAU do after "contacting" the witnesses' psyche? After obtaining illustrative and graphic details of the unconscious of the testimony, such as the form of a rocket he saw on a television program, the helmet he used on his motorcycle, or a striking illustration of a clothing he read over in a magazine, EAU, projects a "three dimensional image", but containing in its "aesthetic" the elements "stolen" from the psyche of the witness, but, distorted (Modified / altered). In this way, the observer will see a UFO with the distorted form of the television rocket, from which descend humanoids, with a type of distorted distortion from the helmet of the motorcycle, or wearing an outlandish dress that the witness has seen in The drawing of the magazine (sometimes only find a detail distorted clearly, but can be several as in this example). The beings and the aircraft, contributed by the united "creativity" of the EAU and the witness, are included in a "modifiable base" (a UFO landing), a template mode, which is also contributed by the EAU and Later elaboration of the whole experience. Therefore, it is logical that the descriptions of the occupants of the flying saucers as well as the ones of the own aircraft, contain nuances as diverse and different, in size, colors and forms, from one event to another, Impossible to confront and label, and that come together in a crazy and endless list of alleged aliens and spaceships. Since this is a highly "creative" process, practically infinite in results and possible variants, determined by the participation of the psyche of the observers, as singular, unpredictable and unrepeatable components, in this case, "the extraterrestrial visitor" and "Flying saucer", can suffer all kinds of variations, combinations and alterations typological, morphological or anatomical based on the unconscious information of the witnesses.
But, UFOs leave traces, cause witness damage, are detected on the radar screens, how does this explain the Theory of Distortion? Occasionally, the projections created by the EAU may contain "MATERIA" (which causes projected elements to have corporeity and can produce prints, burns, footsteps, etc.) to make the observers believe that they are witnessing, in situ, the Disembarkation of an extraterrestrial aircraft. The projection CAN BE OBSERVED BY MORE PEOPLE and behaves as if all the elements put into play by the EAU were really there; Humanoids, ship, lights, etc. Moving and acting as independent beings with their own apparent intelligence. A perfect and complete recreation, in each and every one of its exposed details. Even the witness can touch the elements of the scene represented.
Although in many cases the projection lacks matter (or only it possesses at certain moments), and that is why there are a lot of puzzling and "inexplicable" effects during some UFO encounters: the landing leaves no traces, the ship traverses objects Or poles of the electric line) without producing noises or movements, very few marks are registered on the ground, etc. In addition, the projection can be detected on the radar screens and the "energies" put into operation by the EAU can be caused different effects on the witnesses, such as burns, blindness, dizziness, vomiting, etc.)
What happens to the projection when the UFO experience ends? At no time (or before, not during, or after their encounter) is the witness aware that many of the "ingredients" of that scenery (ship form, morphology of beings, behavior, special details, etc.). ) Have been "unearthed" from their own unconscious, but incorporated into the projection of FORM "DISTORTED" so that they are not recognizable. Therefore, it is obvious if when it is a projection, NOTHING of what happened during the UFO experience is due to an empirical reality, nor does it have a physical continuity in our universe after the encounter is over. That is, the humanoids, the ship and the actions recorded during the experience DO NOT HAVE A REAL EXISTENCE, beyond their projection in the face of witnesses. Simply because nothing of the represented EXISTS outside of the illusion created for the momentary occasion. It is a kind of "film" projected before the eyes of the observers. And just like the characters in a film does not have an extension when the footage ends.
What is the external agent unknown? Probably, none of the physical aspects or actions that the EAU exposes in its multiple erratic manifestations before human beings (Marian apparitions, phantoms, apparitions, cryptozoological beings, UFOs, etc.) is a reflection of their true appearance or purpose. And by implying the "construction" of these manifestations involving a person, it is natural that they contain unique and non-transferable details that will not be repeated in another UFO encounter.
But, who or what is the External Agent Unknown? The EAU can be some kind of PARASITIC ENERGY that needsthe human beliefs, or the interaction with people to "feed" or "subsist." It is quite possible that the EAU is the INSTIGATOR of many myths and folklore present in mankind and has used different masks and clothing to appear to mankind over the centuries. Although this "camouflage" is not synonymous with a clever and great psychic manipulation. The EAU using the unconscious contents of the witnesses, it is obvious that the his manifestations have to be SYNCHRONIC to the interests, Thoughts, imaginary and advances of the time. Nor can it be ruled out that, on occasion, the EAU is limited to using local folklore or latent beliefs in society for its own "benefit", developing them in their eventual contacts with witnesses.
Does the EAU influence with its manifestations in the events or in the becoming of the human beings? The EAU uses continuous SUBTERFUGE and TRICKS in its different contacts with humanity and does not seem to want to influence in a veiled way, or make great social, political changes, nor does it seem to show the slightest interest in the future of the human species. The EAU, although apparent to the contrary, does not pretend, under any concept, the transmission of some type of scientific or philosophical message, beyond the knowledge developed by the human being himself in a process that, in reality, is a "feedback" of information. If in any particular case, visitors have interceded or communicated some type of message that has significantly interfered in the future of the witness and its environment, it is because this information was already buried in the unconscious of the person affected by the contact. They could be termed as "side effects" or "epiphenomena" (an accessory phenomenon accompanying the main phenomenon and having no influence on it) of the "contacts", but which in themselves are not the essential objective of the experiences. In fact, in the vast majority of cases, the influence of this type of experience on the lives of observers is rather superfluous and devoid of special significance in a field beyond the personal. It should be borne in mind that, due to pure statistics, due to the existence of a large number of UFO episodes, there is no doubt that the possibility that some of these encounters with the EDA may lead to some kind of change / interference with greater repercussion in The witness or his environment is viable. But it is only a consequence of the presence of a certain person (with great imaginative potential, creative, social, political, business, etc.) that had that information to develop.
Why many UFOs close encounters contain elements absurd and illogical? The three-dimensional projection tutored by the EAU is "produced" by an "unknown mechanism", but in its development uses a process similar to that of dreams where images and sensations are interlaced and presented in iconographic form. Therefore, as in human dream experiences, the absurd factor or inconsistencies are very present in close encounters with UFOs, but that, controlled at all times by the EAU (which acts as the " Director "of a" movie ") so as not to go too far from the pre-set script of the Alien Visitation. Under this paradigm, these illogical pieces, considered by many researchers as characteristic and revealing elements of the undecipherable UFO phenomenon, show their true and naked meaning. They are simply a consequence of the complex mental process arising from the "symbiosis" of the human mind and the EAU, for the creation of projections. Evidence per se of human mental involvement in the creation of disconcerting experiences.
This is the synthesis of the Theory of Distortion ...
JOSE ANTONIO CARAV@CA
JOSE ANTONIO CARAV@CA
lunes, 27 de marzo de 2017
I am convinced that one of the most transcendental and important clues of anomalous manifestations of any kind (encounter UFOs, ghosts, chupacabras, Marian apparitions, etc.) is the implication of the human psyche, together with an unknown agent, in the construction of some experiences, which we could classify as totally artificial and deceptive. Although for decades, UFO enthusiasts have believed in "alien visitors," complex "control systems," "parallel universes," or "ultra-terrestrial beings" able to create of the most confusing cunning and manipulation, in reality we are confronted with an extraordinary phenomenon, almost exclusively psychic, capable of distorting before our eyes the content of our rich and almost limitless unconscious, to make us believe in a hidden reality non-existent. And it is that the manifestations are nothing more than a spontaneous and ephemeral fictitious recreation of a determined scene, to satisfy unknown interests, that range from the landing of a spaceship, the vision of a Virgin, to a huge hairy and stinky creature that lives hidden in the lush forests.
Although the experiences gathered by the researchers share some points in common, especially the general criteria of the paradigm, most of the content of the experience offers information that is individual and exclusive, that I never, never, we find in another UFO event.
Why? For the simple and inescapable reason that these experiences are nontransferable or extrapolable to another UFO episode, since it is the intimate psyche of the witness that contributes the "material" that will illustrate, for example, the close encounter with extraterrestrial beings. No one else around the world, despite the existence of a monumental UFO literature return to see humanoids who have been reported by a particular witness. We are faced with a phenomenon of psychic dimensions caused by an unknown disorder? If we were to faced a strictly psychic phenomenon, not yet diagnosed by science, without supernatural connotations, the UFO manifestations, and other manifestations, would show in a more public and uncontrolled way, and not with the astonishing elusiveness of what it does gala, showing only on certain occasions and front certain people. And of course, this phenomenon would not leave traces or remains ... We are facing another "thing" ... but we continue to advance ...
JOSE ANTONIO CARAV@CA
JOSE ANTONIO CARAV@CA
miércoles, 1 de marzo de 2017
According to the theory of distortion, the involvement and participation of the mind of the witness, is essential in "making" and "projection" of the experiences of close encounters with UFOs. First, as "source documents", where the “external agent”, extract "information" (elements) to be used in the representation (oneiric theater) of contact with extraterrestrial beings.
And two, the mind of the witness, being attuned to this “external agent”, is the point of origin of the communication, and therefore, although there is a "stimulus" external "real" (independent, three-dimensional), such as a flying saucer landed, the "stimulus" is not through the nerves of the eye. The witness's own mind is the beginning of phenomenology.
So this would explain why many witnesses were able to recall many details of their experience, (although this was very short in time) as the "recording" of memory occurs directly on the brain of the witness (a neurological level .)
This cause may also be an effect of tuning (communication or data transfer) between the two participants in the construction of anomalous experience (the human mind and the “external agent”).
We must remember, that the involvement of the “external agent” helps maintain a structure "consistent" in the final result of experience (extraterrestrial visitation), avoiding the involvement of elements certainly extravagant and "anachronistic.” For example, that inside the UFO, the witness observes his father-in-law or his boss. Moreover, the “external agent” inserts into the internal structure of the close encounter, certain common elements that are unknown by the various witnesses but are repeated throughout the world.
Here is an example: On December 30, 1972, in Tres Arroyos, 500 kilometers from Buenos Aires (Argentina), about 22:30 p.m, Mr. Ventura Maceiras, 73, was having a drink on the outside of his isolated home, close to a fire and with his pets, a dog and a cat and their young ones. Suddenly the radio started having interference, until it stopped working. At that moment he heard a loud noise, like a swarm of bees that increased its sound level. The witness observed a bright light, which came from an object about 20 or 25 meters in diameter and was disc-shaped, the color of red /orange. The artifact floated about 10 or 20 meters above the ground. At the top of the disc was a luminous dome with windows. The object emitted sparks from the bottom. The disk was tilted toward the witness, Ventura Maceiras observed a humanoid with a transparent helmet (like an astronaut’s), wearing a dark gray suit inflated like the Bibendum/Michelin Man).
From the top of the helmet came a tube joined to a "parachute" on the back. Behind this humanoid, there was another being, looking over the shoulder of his or her companion. Both had slit eyes, the mouth was a simple line; the witness remembers nothing of a nose or ears.
On the back wall of the object, Maceiras saw, perfectly, a flag with an emblem. In the emblem was a "seahorse" with a "crown" on its head. The emblem also had several signs that Maceiras did not recognize. The upper half of the emblem was light blue with gold lower on the lower half. The witness also told investigators that he also saw an impressive number of instruments and "watches.”
Then the flying saucer launched a very powerful beam of light that blinded Maceiras. The cat that was also in the path of the light disappeared immediately. The artifact changed color from red / orange to blue/ green and started to move until it was lost in the distance.
The experience lasted about 20 seconds. The cat re-appeared on February 16, 1973, with "burned" fur and acting jittery. Shortly afterwards both the dog and cat died. During the experience, the witness noticed a tingling sensation in the legs. After the encounter, the researcher Peter Romaniuk interviewed Maceiras.
Maceiras told Romaniuk that he (Maceiras) suffered physical symptoms; headaches, diarrhea, nausea, hair loss, and had difficulty speaking. He also had burning eyes (emitting strange tears, with very fine threads in their interior, such as hairs 2 to 3 cm long).
Later, his vision improved considerably, and he stopped wearing his glasses. Ventura Maceiras was practically illiterate, lived alone and had no television. He had never been to the cinema and did not know anything about the UFO phenomenon. The researchers were amazed by the ability of Maceiras, in just 20 seconds, to memorize a lot of information (in an anomalous situation) about the appearance of a flying saucer, its occupants, and interior (including colors and sounds). The symbols observed inside the UFO, especially the "seahorse with the crown" indicate the product of the unconscious of the witness, as determined by the researchers who interviewed Maceiras,
It is also very strange that, for example, the distance at which the witness was from the object, he was able to observe that the tube on the helmet, joined with the "parachute" -- because physically, it would have been impossible for him to see it. Unless, we admit, as maintained by the Theory of Distortion, the "vision" is produced directly in the brain (such as dreams and hallucinations) and therefore the human eye is not limited to the conditions of reality.In dreams we see “inexplicable" forms of tiny objects, or things in the distance, appearing clear, or even things that are behind us. Even stranger is that Ventura Maceiras perfectly saw through the window, the controls of the object and in the background, a "flag" with a sea horse, which had a small crown on its head.
Also, Distortion Theory explains why the details would be easily remembered because the stimulation and direct production in the brain facilitates the assimilation and recall.
FROM PRUNIO TO THE MIND
Subsequently, on February 24, 1973, Ventura Maceiras said he again saw the crew of the UFO (not flying saucer). He was inside his house when a tall-statured humanoid with wavy hair, slanted eyes, wearing a one-piece suit with a belt containing a small box with button-like protrusions appeared. The humanoid called himself "Arnoil" and said he came from the planet "Prunio", located in the center of the Milky Way. After a long conversation, where they talked about different issues, from the propulsion of ships, to the religion practiced on "Prunio,” the alien pressed a button on the box and disappeared, totally in an instant. After his encounter, Maceiras started talking about different issues involving the universe, the operation of flying saucers, philosophy, et cetera.
Without doubt, the side effects of such interactions with the "outsider" during the experience connects with the brain, resulting in multiple sensory phenomena (hallucinations) that develop later as part of the effects of the distortion process. This would explain the "quaint" and "insane" claims and statements of some witnesses after their close encounters. This does not mean that some of the secondary experiences are the products of a subsequent contact with the "external agent" but is in another area, away from the "physical" occurring on a mental level only.
Jose Antonio Carav@ca