lunes, 1 de mayo de 2017

THE SHIPWRECK OF THE EXTRATERRESTRIAL HYPOTHESIS... AND THE DISTORTION ...





Despite what the profane reader may think of the ufological subjects, most of the UFO casuistry is plagued with "objetcs" that do not have to do with the famous flying saucers. And, in fact, almost any form of flying apparatus, no matter how absurd it may seem, and no matter how far from an aerodynamic line, has been observed flying our skies, proving that the phenomenon of the unidentified is much more complex than some would like.
And just as with the humanoid typology, almost infinite and impossible to classify, the "flying saucer" models are so many and different that it is highly unlikely that our hypothetical visitants extraterrestrials to have a variety of ships in their hangars. OR That we are being visited, as if our planet were a space zoo, by infinite  alien civilitations... These anomalies are undoubtedly the sign of the existence of an unknown paradigm related to our psyche, which, although provoked and directed by an agent external to our mind, is capable of catalyzing and transforming our thoughts into a distorted "staging" of alien visitation. Is therefore "logical" that UFO literature is broad and divergent as broad and heterogeneous are the witnesses that present themselves and star in this phenomenon, mutable based on our intellectual wealth. Which is able to create a "holographic" projection an apparent reality, but ephemeral and fiction, about Ghosts apparitions, of the Virgin Mary or the Abominable Snowman.

And only on rare occasions, for reasons or conjunctions of elements and factors that we can not even venture, this type of experience acquires a momentary corporality to give the appearance of what is not and will never be ... a "reality" like we understand it.
 Therefore, nothing of the perceived during this type of experiences has a physical continuity in our universe ... in the same way that the protagonists of a film do not continue the plot after it has finished to project the film ...
Definitely the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis has shipwrecked ...








JOSE ANTONIO CARAV@CA

domingo, 2 de abril de 2017

WHAT IS THE DISTORTION THEORY?








Let us try to explain what are the basic principles of the DISTORTION THEORY (DT). One of the main points to be clarified, before starting, is that DT does not defend that the UFO phenomenon has a purely psychological, sociological or hallucinatory origin, all contrary, it is PRODUCED, in the first instance, by the INTERACTION / COMMUNICATION OF AN EXTERNAL AGENT UNKNOWN (UAE), INTELLIGENT AND INDEPENDENT TO THE HUMAN BEING, with a witness that describing experiences with UFOs. To achieve its objectives, the EAU "CONNECTS" with the psyche of the observers to "extract", from the individual and exclusive unconscious of them, intellectual material (found in hobbies, culture, cinema, literature, etc.). The purpose of MANUFACTURING / PROJECTING an FICTION ALIEN VISITATION (for example, landing of a flying saucer and its occupants).
What exactly does the EAU do after "contacting" the witnesses' psyche? After obtaining illustrative and graphic details of the unconscious of the testimony, such as the form of a rocket he saw on a television program, the helmet he used on his motorcycle, or a striking illustration of a clothing he read over in a magazine, EAU, projects a "three dimensional image", but containing in its "aesthetic" the elements "stolen" from the psyche of the witness, but, distorted (Modified / altered). In this way, the observer will see a UFO with the distorted form of the television rocket, from which descend humanoids, with a type of distorted distortion from the helmet of the motorcycle, or wearing an outlandish dress that the witness has seen in The drawing of the magazine (sometimes only find a detail distorted clearly, but can be several as in this example). The beings and the aircraft, contributed by the united "creativity" of the EAU and the witness, are included in a "modifiable base" (a UFO landing), a template mode, which is also contributed by the EAU and Later elaboration of the whole experience. Therefore, it is logical that the descriptions of the occupants of the flying saucers as well as the ones of the own aircraft, contain nuances as diverse and different, in size, colors and forms, from one event to another, Impossible to confront and label, and that come together in a crazy and endless list of alleged aliens and spaceships. Since this is a highly "creative" process, practically infinite in results and possible variants, determined by the participation of the psyche of the observers, as singular, unpredictable and unrepeatable components, in this case, "the extraterrestrial visitor" and "Flying saucer", can suffer all kinds of variations, combinations and alterations typological, morphological or anatomical based on the unconscious information of the witnesses.
But, UFOs leave traces, cause witness damage, are detected on the radar screens, how does this explain the Theory of Distortion? Occasionally, the projections created by the EAU may contain "MATERIA" (which causes projected elements to have corporeity and can produce prints, burns, footsteps, etc.) to make the observers believe that they are witnessing, in situ, the Disembarkation of an extraterrestrial aircraft. The projection CAN BE OBSERVED BY MORE PEOPLE and behaves as if all the elements put into play by the EAU were really there; Humanoids, ship, lights, etc. Moving and acting as independent beings with their own apparent intelligence. A perfect and complete recreation, in each and every one of its exposed details. Even the witness can touch the elements of the scene represented.

Although in many cases the projection lacks matter (or only it possesses at certain moments), and that is why there are a lot of puzzling and "inexplicable" effects during some UFO encounters: the landing leaves no traces, the ship traverses objects Or poles of the electric line) without producing noises or movements, very few marks are registered on the ground, etc. In addition, the projection can be detected on the radar screens and  the "energies" put into operation by the EAU can be  caused different effects on the witnesses, such as burns, blindness, dizziness, vomiting, etc.)
What happens to the projection when the UFO experience ends? At no time (or before, not during, or after their encounter) is the witness aware that many of the "ingredients" of that scenery (ship form, morphology of beings, behavior, special details, etc.). ) Have been "unearthed" from their own unconscious, but incorporated into the projection of FORM "DISTORTED"  so that they are not recognizable. Therefore, it is obvious if when it is a projection, NOTHING of what happened during the UFO experience is due to an empirical reality, nor does it have a physical continuity in our universe after the encounter is over. That is, the humanoids, the ship and the actions recorded during the experience DO NOT HAVE A REAL EXISTENCE, beyond their projection in the face of witnesses. Simply because nothing of the represented EXISTS outside of the illusion created for the momentary occasion. It is a kind of "film" projected before the eyes of the observers. And just like the characters in a film does not have an extension when the footage ends.
What is the external agent unknown? Probably, none of the physical aspects or actions that the EAU exposes in its multiple erratic manifestations before human beings (Marian apparitions, phantoms, apparitions, cryptozoological beings, UFOs, etc.) is a reflection of their true appearance or purpose. And by implying the "construction" of these manifestations involving a person, it is natural that they contain unique and non-transferable details that will not be repeated in another UFO encounter.





But, who or what is the External Agent Unknown? The EAU can be some kind of PARASITIC ENERGY  that needsthe human beliefs, or the interaction with people to "feed" or "subsist." It is quite possible that the EAU is the INSTIGATOR of many myths and folklore present in mankind and has used different masks and clothing to appear to mankind over the centuries. Although this "camouflage" is not synonymous with a clever and great psychic manipulation. The EAU using the unconscious contents of the witnesses, it is obvious that the his manifestations have to be SYNCHRONIC to the interests, Thoughts, imaginary and advances of the time. Nor can it be ruled out that, on occasion, the EAU is limited to using local folklore or latent beliefs in society for its own "benefit", developing them in their eventual contacts with witnesses.
Does the EAU influence with its manifestations in the events or in the becoming of the human beings? The EAU uses continuous SUBTERFUGE and TRICKS in its different contacts with humanity and does not seem to want to influence in a veiled way, or make great social, political changes, nor does it seem to show the slightest interest in the future of the human species. The EAU, although apparent to the contrary, does not pretend, under any concept, the transmission of some type of scientific or philosophical message, beyond the knowledge developed by the human being himself in a process that, in reality, is a "feedback" of information. If in any particular case, visitors have interceded or communicated some type of message that has significantly interfered in the future of the witness and its environment, it is because this information was already buried in the unconscious of the person affected by the contact. They could be termed as "side effects" or "epiphenomena" (an accessory phenomenon accompanying the main phenomenon and having no influence on it) of the "contacts", but which in themselves are not the essential objective of the experiences. In fact, in the vast majority of cases, the influence of this type of experience on the lives of observers is rather superfluous and devoid of special significance in a field beyond the personal. It should be borne in mind that, due to pure statistics, due to the existence of a large number of UFO episodes, there is no doubt that the possibility that some of these encounters with the EDA may lead to some kind of change / interference with greater repercussion in The witness or his environment is viable. But it is only a consequence of the presence of a certain person (with great imaginative potential, creative, social, political, business, etc.) that had that information to develop.
Why  many UFOs close encounters contain elements absurd and illogical? The three-dimensional projection tutored by the EAU is "produced" by an "unknown mechanism", but in its development uses a process similar to that of dreams where images and sensations are interlaced and presented in iconographic form. Therefore, as in human dream experiences, the absurd factor or inconsistencies are very present in close encounters with UFOs, but that, controlled at all times by the EAU (which acts as the " Director "of a" movie ") so as not to go too far from the pre-set script of the Alien Visitation. Under this paradigm, these illogical pieces, considered by many researchers as characteristic and revealing elements of the undecipherable UFO phenomenon, show their true and naked meaning. They are simply a consequence of the complex mental process arising from the "symbiosis" of the human mind and the EAU, for the creation of projections. Evidence per se of human mental involvement in the creation of disconcerting experiences.

This is the synthesis of the Theory of Distortion ...



JOSE ANTONIO CARAV@CA

lunes, 27 de marzo de 2017

UFO: THE QUIMERIC AND THE FALAZ UFO CASUISTRY

 



 
I am convinced that one of the most transcendental and important clues of anomalous manifestations of any kind (encounter UFOs, ghosts, chupacabras, Marian apparitions, etc.) is the implication of the human psyche, together with an unknown agent, in the construction of some experiences, which we could classify as totally artificial and deceptive. Although for decades, UFO enthusiasts have believed in "alien visitors," complex "control systems," "parallel universes," or "ultra-terrestrial beings" able to create of the most confusing cunning and manipulation, in reality we are confronted with an extraordinary phenomenon, almost exclusively psychic, capable of distorting before our eyes the content of our rich and almost limitless unconscious, to make us believe in a hidden reality non-existent. And it is that the manifestations are nothing more than a spontaneous and ephemeral fictitious recreation  of a determined scene, to satisfy unknown interests, that range from the landing of a spaceship, the vision of a Virgin, to a huge hairy and stinky creature that lives hidden in the lush forests.
Although the experiences gathered by the researchers share some points in common, especially the general criteria of the paradigm, most of the content of the experience offers information that is individual and exclusive, that I never, never, we find in another UFO event.

Why? For the simple and inescapable reason that these experiences are nontransferable or extrapolable to another UFO episode, since it is the intimate psyche of the witness that contributes the "material" that will illustrate, for example, the close encounter with extraterrestrial beings. No one else around the world, despite the existence of a monumental UFO literature return to see humanoids who have been reported by a particular witness. We are faced with a phenomenon of psychic dimensions caused by an unknown disorder? If we were to faced a strictly psychic phenomenon, not yet diagnosed by science, without supernatural connotations, the UFO manifestations, and other manifestations, would show in a more public and uncontrolled way, and not with the astonishing elusiveness of what it does gala, showing only on certain occasions and front certain people. And of course, this phenomenon  would not leave traces or remains ... We are facing another "thing" ... but we continue to advance ...





JOSE ANTONIO CARAV@CA

miércoles, 1 de marzo de 2017

THE ENCOUNTER OF VENTURA MACEIRAS: THE DISTORTION THEORY AND THE MENTAL FACTOR




According to the theory of distortion, the involvement and participation of the mind of the witness, is essential in "making" and "projection" of the experiences of close encounters with UFOs. First, as "source documents", where the “external agent”, extract "information" (elements) to be used in the representation (oneiric theater) of contact with extraterrestrial beings.
And two, the mind of the witness, being attuned to this “external agent”, is the point of origin of the communication, and therefore, although there is a "stimulus" external "real" (independent, three-dimensional), such as a flying saucer landed, the "stimulus" is not through the nerves of the eye. The witness's own mind is the beginning of phenomenology.
So this would explain why many witnesses were able to recall many details of their experience, (although this was very short in time) as the "recording" of memory occurs directly on the brain of the witness (a neurological level .)
This cause may also be an effect of tuning (communication or data transfer) between the two participants in the construction of anomalous experience (the human mind and the “external agent”).
We must remember, that the involvement of the “external agent” helps maintain a structure "consistent" in the final result of experience (extraterrestrial visitation), avoiding the involvement of elements certainly extravagant and "anachronistic.” For example, that inside the UFO, the witness observes his father-in-law or his boss. Moreover, the “external agent” inserts into the internal structure of the close encounter, certain common elements that are unknown by the various witnesses but are repeated throughout the world.







Here is an example: On December 30, 1972, in Tres Arroyos, 500 kilometers from Buenos Aires (Argentina), about 22:30 p.m, Mr. Ventura Maceiras, 73, was having a drink on the outside of his isolated home, close to a fire and with his pets, a dog and a cat and their young ones. Suddenly the radio started having interference, until it stopped working. At that moment he heard a loud noise, like a swarm of bees that increased its sound level. The witness observed a bright light, which came from an object about 20 or 25 meters in diameter and was disc-shaped, the color of red /orange. The artifact floated about 10 or 20 meters above the ground. At the top of the disc was a luminous dome with windows. The object emitted sparks from the bottom. The disk was tilted toward the witness, Ventura Maceiras observed a humanoid with a transparent helmet (like an astronaut’s), wearing a dark gray suit inflated like the Bibendum/Michelin Man).
From the top of the helmet came a tube joined to a "parachute" on the back.  Behind this humanoid, there was another being, looking over the shoulder of his or her companion. Both had slit eyes, the mouth was a simple line; the witness remembers nothing of a nose or ears.






On the back wall of the object, Maceiras saw, perfectly, a flag with an emblem. In the emblem was a "seahorse" with a "crown" on its head. The emblem also had several signs that Maceiras did not recognize. The upper half of the emblem was light blue with gold lower on the lower half. The witness also told investigators that he also saw an impressive number of instruments and "watches.”
Then the flying saucer launched a very powerful beam of light that blinded Maceiras. The cat that was also in the path of the light disappeared immediately. The artifact changed color from red / orange to blue/ green and started to move until it was lost in the distance.
The experience lasted about 20 seconds. The cat re-appeared on February 16, 1973, with "burned" fur and acting jittery. Shortly afterwards both the dog and cat died. During the experience, the witness noticed a tingling sensation in the legs. After the encounter, the researcher Peter Romaniuk interviewed Maceiras.
Maceiras told Romaniuk that he (Maceiras) suffered physical symptoms; headaches, diarrhea, nausea, hair loss, and had difficulty speaking. He also had burning eyes (emitting strange tears, with very fine threads in their interior, such as hairs 2 to 3 cm long).
Later, his vision improved considerably, and he stopped wearing his glasses. Ventura Maceiras was practically illiterate, lived alone and had no television. He had never been to the cinema and did not know anything about the UFO phenomenon. The researchers were amazed by the ability of Maceiras, in just 20 seconds, to memorize a lot of information (in an anomalous situation) about the appearance of a flying saucer, its occupants, and interior (including colors and sounds). The symbols observed inside the UFO, especially the "seahorse with the crown" indicate the product of the unconscious of the witness, as determined by the researchers who interviewed Maceiras,
It is also very strange that, for example, the distance at which the witness was from the object, he was able to observe that the tube on the helmet, joined with the "parachute" -- because physically, it would have been impossible for him to see it. Unless, we admit, as maintained by the Theory of Distortion, the "vision" is produced directly in the brain (such as dreams and hallucinations) and therefore the human eye is not limited to the conditions of reality.In dreams we see “inexplicable" forms of tiny objects, or things in the distance, appearing clear, or even things that are behind us. Even stranger is that Ventura Maceiras perfectly saw through the window, the controls of the object and in the background, a "flag" with a sea horse, which had a small crown on its head.
Also, Distortion Theory explains why the details would be easily remembered because the stimulation and direct production in the brain facilitates the assimilation and recall.


FROM PRUNIO TO THE MIND

Subsequently, on February 24, 1973, Ventura Maceiras said he again saw the crew of the UFO (not flying saucer).  He was inside his house when a tall-statured humanoid with wavy hair, slanted eyes, wearing a one-piece suit with a belt containing a small box with button-like protrusions appeared. The humanoid called himself "Arnoil" and said he came from the planet "Prunio", located in the center of the Milky Way. After a long conversation, where they talked about different issues, from the propulsion of ships, to the religion practiced on "Prunio,” the alien pressed a button on the box and disappeared, totally in an instant. After his encounter, Maceiras started talking about different issues involving the universe, the operation of flying saucers, philosophy, et cetera.








 Without doubt, the side effects of such interactions with the "outsider" during the experience connects with the brain, resulting in multiple sensory phenomena (hallucinations) that develop later as part of the effects of the distortion process. This would explain the "quaint" and "insane" claims and statements of some witnesses after their close encounters. This does not mean that some of the secondary experiences are the products of a subsequent contact with the "external agent" but is in another area, away from the "physical" occurring on a mental level only.




Jose Antonio Carav@ca 

martes, 1 de noviembre de 2016

THE DISTORTION THEORY...




The DistortionTheory offers a new and revolutionary point of view concerning close encounters with UFO and their alleged crews. In order to do that, this theory has its own terminology to try to define accurately some of the key concepts within the theory. Let´s review them to enable a full understanding of their main principles:


EXTERNAL AGENT
This term defines the “operator” or “entity” that interacts, under certain conditions, with the witness’ psyche in order to “manufacture” a so called “UFO experience”. Probably none of the features or actions that are displayed in their numerous manifestations have nothing to do with its true appearance or purpose. The point of this “external agent” is to make the observer believe through a complex holographic projection that they are being witness of the landing of anextra-terrestrial spacecraft and the disembarking of their crew members. But none of this is related to a factual reality neither it has the quality of being persistent in our universe once the experience is finished. Then, who is the External Agent? This External Agent could be a parasitic entity which either feeds on human beliefs or needs human interaction to survive. It’s very likely that the External Agent could be behind of many myths and folklore in the history of mankind disguised under many different manifestations. This camouflage can be identified as a skilful and huge psychic manipulation, as some researchers claim, but it’s obvious that some unconscious mental contents are at play and those are in sync with the sociocultural and historical context at all levels: philosophy, technology, art, etc…

Science fiction did not anticipate the content that later would be in UFO close encounters, simply is the source as the basis for their development. ( Illustration Buck Rogers. Mars Prince of Mars. 1930)




It cannot be ruled out that the External Agent is using latent beliefs within particular societies for its own sake. The External Agent uses then subterfuges and deception constantly in its interactions with human societies and doesn’t seem interested at all neither in fostering any positive social changes nor making the attempt of influencing the fate of mankind. Despite some messages that could point otherwise, the External Agent has no real purpose to convey any scientific or philosophic message beyond those already developed by man itself.

SHARED MENTAL CREATION
When the External Agent is in touch or interacts with the witness’ psyche, an information transfer is made at an unconscious level,that will be embodied within the experience in a distorted way so the observer is not able to identify as self-made. Whatever is displayed in front of the witness will be a by-product of the symbiosis between both operators, the unknown entity and the human being, and it will be manifested as a holographic projection. Therefore, most of the details and factors that are part of a close encounter can be perfectly tracked down in the observer’s psyche. The most evident and notorious elements nevertheless will be those unique features (Such as traits from a humanoid or technical details from the craft) that cannot be found in similar events.

DISTORTION
The information extracted unconsciously from the witness is displayed and rearranged by the External Agent in a distorted way so the observer will not be able to recognize it. The source of this information can be very diferent: literature, TV, work, environment, hobbies, etc…
All these conceptual resources will be used to stage a projection where the witness will be actually convinced that he’s observing, for instance, an UFO landing. This will be the explanation behind why there are so many different types of “flying saucers” and “extra-terrestrials”. The External Agent uses a very different range of sources to create those experiences that their manifestations may vary wildly from one to another.





After the interaction with the witness’ psyche, the “external agent” obtains the essential information to reproduce a holographic projection that will generate an illusoryenvironment where a close encounter with UFO is re-enacted. This projection can be seen externally by a third person but having an unknownpsychic foundation, the perception made by other observer may vary from the one made by the main witness or even some individuals will not be able to be aware of the event at all. The witness will be able to interact with the projection as if he was within a full virtual reality experiment.The witness will be able to touch and feel the elements of the projection as if they were actually there.

EVANESCENT MATTER
The External agent in some occasions can grant to the “holographic projection” a fleeting and momentary material quality in our own reality. Therefore, traces of a landing might appear in some incidents and in some might not, regardless of the terrain conditions.
For instance, in Sangonera La Verde (Murcia) on July 1st 1979 there was a report of an UFO landing. According to several witness a giant humanoid was seen in the surroundings walking around 800 meters but only two footprints were found (One of them partial)
This evanescent matter would be able to explain an array of anomalies linked to UFO close encounters such as:
1.      UFO flying through vegetation or power wires without making any noise or impact.
2.      The randomness in the traces left behind by UFO where in some cases there are obvious marks meanwhile in others there is no evidence at all.
3.      The lack of marks, trails or footprints after a sizeable event has happened involving entities and crafts.
4.      The ability shown by humanoids to go through walls or fences.
5.      The reported silence that goes along with close encounter events.

BASIC ARCHETYPES
The External Agent displays in the generated projections very defined behavioural patterns that can be easily identified to facilitate the assimilation and development of these experiences. Most close encounter events, despite their changing and external appearance, display a very similar pattern. The so-called extra-terrestrials are usually doing some of these three universal actions
1.      Exploring the surroundings
2.      Collecting samples
3.      Repairing their spacecraft.
All these three actions will match with what we would expect from an interstellar human explorer visiting another planet so they fulfil the mission of integrating distinctive human concepts within supernatural experiences.





On top of this, the eventual presence of the witness always provokes a surprise reaction to the extra-terrestrials that leads them to leave the place immediately due to the “unexpected” visit of the observer. This farce is a deception with the purpose to manipulate the witness reaction. If we would buy the idea that we had met by pure chance some alien visitors that they don’t want to be seen, they would avoid populated areas but invariably lot of close encounters are reported in areas with continuous human presence such as roads, cities, villages, etc…
Another trait that is also very common in the behaviour of these UFO crew-members is to dazzle witness with devices that project a blinding light.

ONEIRIC CREATIVITY/ THE “MUMBO-JUMBO” FACTOR
The process that leads to the “holographic projection” is defined by the Distortion Theory as oneiric creativity because the way it works is very similar to the patterns displayed by human psyche meanwhile we dream. The unconscious contents of the witness are rearranged and projected by the “External Agent” in a creative process, that we can even label as artistic, that contains lot of the nonsensical elements that we usually associate with our most vivid dreams. The distortion displayed within one close encounter experience is very similar to the distortion that we face when we dream.
This would help us to understand one of the most puzzling issues that we find in Close Encounter: The Mumbo-Jumbo Factor. All these nonsensical elements that we find in the UFO experiences which so far they had served only to invalidate and reduce the credibility of the UFO phenomenon in front of the public opinion.
Nevertheless, according to the Distortion Theory this universal non-sense factor is simplified. The internal mechanics behind the creation of these experiences have built-in and integrated these nonsensical factors that actually they have their source in the witness own subconscious.

Those absurd details then don’t have any special or transcendental meaning beyond the remarked artistic/creative value expressed in a holographic projection which introduces us to a dream-like fiction in what concerns to its development and staging. Although the final purpose of these interventions is still unknown to us.  







JOSE ANTONIO CARAV@CA



Thanks to PABLO VERGEL


martes, 11 de octubre de 2016

THE "SPACE RIDER" WHO CAME IN FROM OUTER SPACE?





In a simple search from the casuistry UFO, anywhere in the world, you can find the effects of "distortion" without difficulty.
If UFO researchers had conditioned (guided) their investigations to search for the "psychological factors" that may have influenced (distorted) UFO experiences, we would have had many different kinds of other surprises.
But that isn’t the case; witnesses who’ve seen documentaries or movies that contain analogies of encounters (UFO shapes, humanoid clothing, behavior of the crew, concrete details, etc) will interpolate the elements of those documentaries or movies into their experience.
Distortion theory can explain, without resorting to complex psychological hypotheses, the variety of humanoid types and the absurd or unreal of many UFO experiences.
Some researchers say the phenomenon deliberately chooses to display its manifestations to look illogical and absurd, assuming that "entities" must know perfectly the human psyche (and logic) to represent a "thing" as absurd in the eyes of witnesses. 
Is probably that an phenomenon controllated for entites making the concept ridiculous, bizarre and illogical to perfection, to dramatize it?. This is very unlikely.
However, Distortion Theory explains these aspects as absurd as it would be the primary result of the Distortion, the human mind (with the interaction of an external agent) projects a reality, "altered" and unknown (like oneiric experience, mixing fantastic and normal elements, at random, to create a dream).
The triggering factor (origin) of close encounters comes from an unknown "external agent."

The external agent selects the witnesses and the site according to their unknown purposes. The essential argument of the experience (extraterrestrial visitation) is chosen (projected) by the "external agent," although most of the items displayed at the encounter result from the merger of the minds of the witnesses (distortion effect) with the producer (sender) as an external factor. It also helps in building the experience, from common elements recognizable to the human species contained in the collective unconscious (Jung).

However, the "external agent" contributes (provides) some common factors with other UFO experiences (in different parts of the world), so that they will not be confused with hallucinations, delusions or simple mental (and physical markings). Even the alleged physical traces left on the ground after a UFO landing are still easily recognizable although they are distortions of elements by the witnesses (and researchers): footsteps, burns, holes, stains of "oil" etc. Why have we not found evidence of another type, difficult to pigeonhole in our scientific parameters? Can a technical spacecraft (unimaginable to our modern science) leave trails as a simple terrestrial machine?

An example of Distortion in a classic encounter of third kind in Spain:

On July 1, 1979, in Sangonera la Verde (Murcia) four young people, Gines Jimenez, 18, Jesus Gregorio Ballester, 17, Antonio Guirao, 16, and Jose Carrillo, 14, around 00:00, had a terrifying encounter with a giant humanoid.
Traveling on motorcycles, they went into the forest with the intention of gathering birds' nests. When they arrived, they saw, on "El Cabezo Colorao" (a nearby hill), a light coming down from heaven. It was a very bright, circular, and luminous white, illuminating the surrounding area.


It was the size of a car, and landed about 400 meters from where they were. Using the headlight of the motorcycle, they made flares, which were answered by this "thing" with intermittent light.
After several minutes of observation, the witnesses heard the sound of footsteps in the bushes, and saw the emergence, in the shadows of the night, a giant humanoid who was gawky and slow. They told the press in 1979, the "being" was 2.5 meters tall, had "a kind of raincoat, something like plastic, zippered with pockets, chest lines, and a kind of mask or helmet square on the head."
The “being” walked slowly, the witnesses saying the walk was "like a gorilla or a monster from the movies." The appearance of the humanoid was similar to that of a rider. With the dark visor on the helmet and tight “plastic” clothing" with zippers and pockets on the "jacket", the “being” was more appropriate as a Harley Davidson fan than that of a spacefarer.






Most reports of alleged extraterrestrial humanoids say that their clothing is completely without buttons, seams, joints or any kind of zipper, which is obviously not the case in this particular incident. Besides the clothes, "plastic" was in vogue at the time of the apparition. Ginés Jiménez said the "giant" spoke in a language they could not understand. Scared, the four youths fled to the village. Some neighbors had seen the light off the mountain in the distance, so they did not doubt the testimony of the young people.

At the place of the close encounter, the researchers found crushed grass, only two giant humanoid footprints (but only one was perfect) and three marks deep in the ground from the supposed legs of the artifact. These three tracks, according to researcher Jesus Sanchez, were arranged in an isosceles triangle, showing that the object had adapted to uneven ground, to maintain a level plane inside the artifact.

With respect to the footprint, it was an average 38 centimeters and very wide, 14 centimeters, sunk into the ground demonstrating that the humanoid was very heavy. The other partial footprint was found (oblique to the first), but, inexplicably, no more traces, were found on the alleged track of the humanoid of more than 400 meters back and forth -- more than 800 meters and only one perfect mark -- impossible if they were part of a physical phenomenon.

To the mind of the four witnesses, the "humanoid" "materialized" (Distortion) like a "rider from space", helmet included. The witnesses had motorcycles and modern, youthful clothing and their behavior in the night, was typical for teenagers; it was terrifying, as in horror movies. Just describing the humanoid caused fear.
So again we are faced with an episode of Distortion, where the humanoid in particular, is "constructed” from the psyche of the teens, and the rest of the evidence and elements of the event (like other frequent close encounters) a product of the "external agent."

I invite you to find another "space rider," with zippers and pockets, in the large humanoid casuistry.

You probably will not find it ... but if found, strive to look for the undeniable effects of the Distortion...







JOSE ANTONIO CARAV@CA

domingo, 25 de septiembre de 2016

EXTRATERRESTRIAL MECHANICS: THE ARCHETYPE AND “DISTORTION”



Close encounters with UFOs, are characterized by elements (excuses) recognizable by the witnesses, so that the observation parameters are made under "reasonable" concepts, in the extraordinary context that represents the vision of a "flying saucer.”
Thus, what the witness thinks "dominates" (controls) to some extent their observation.
Witnesses identify behaviors and attitudes as completely normal in cases of extraterrestrial visitors. They behave as would any person, for example, who has suffered a setback on the road.
This is why one of the most common scenarios preferred (used) by the crewS of UFOS, in close encounters, is damage to their “Aircraft.”
Witnesses recognize the staging (theater) as the UFO landing due to some fault in the aircraft and their crews repairing it in the same way that a car is repaired.
All this is due at the beginning of the distortion, since the phenomenon is presented in the information provided from the unconscious of the witness, mainly on two premises:

1 The effect recognizable and assimilated (a breakdown on the road) as a universal collective “archetype.”

2 The humanoids behave and use human-like tools and procedures in their repair work.

Here's an example:

On the night of November 23, 1964, in New Berlin (New York), 1:00 am, Ms. Marianne observed a light coming down. With the aid of binoculars she saw a very bright object supported by several feet. A light emerged below the artefact, illuminating the ground. She could not specify the shape of the UFO. Accompanied by her mother-in-law, the witness saw 5 or 6 humanoids working on repairing the object. They had a height of 2 meters and 2.5 meters. They wore costumes like a divers-suit, dark in color.

The hands were clear and not covered. The “crew” were carrying toolboxes. Marianne said: "They worked on that vehicle, just as I have seen my father work on farm machinery. They had screwdrivers and wrenches and all kinds of tools like those used to repaira damaged machinery.”

On the ground was a large object like a motor or generator. The witness indicated that the humanoids were working with the same movements as would a terrestrial mechanic: kneeling, lying on the ground, leaning on elbows, et cetera. Then the, women observed another UFO landing nearby.
From that object, 4 o 5 humanoids descended to help the others with repair tasks. They came and went constantly, between artifacts, carrying all kinds of tools. The humanoids cut a long wire into several equal sections. When they tried to enter the "engine" under the UFO they couldn’t for some reason. After trying on 4 occasions, after much effort, they succeeded getting to the engine.
They gathered all their tools and the crews returned to their respective aircrafts. At 4.55 am, the first object disappeared in the distance. Just a minute later, the second UFO flew away.
The next day Marianne, with Richard, her husband (who the night before was hunting with his father) inspected the landing spot. They found three irregularly shaped footprints of about 45'5 centimeters deep. Something heavy had caused the indentations. Marianne found a piece of cable about 2.5 centimeters in diameter, wrapped in a paper-like material. The cable was similar to aluminum, but did not have the specific qualities of that metal. Upon returning home, the mother of Richard kept the piece of cable, but when the researchers came to the site, it had inexplicably disappeared. No doubt in some cases associated with the phenomenon of distortion, the material created from such an encounter will last beyond the presence of the entities in the place of the apparition. It would be “ephemeral material” whose existence would not last for a long time, vanishing without a trace -- a phenomenon observed for example in the "showers of angel hair" in some UFO encounters, and even the apparition of the Virgin of Fatima, which appeared from the sky and then disappeared.



In the present case we find the two paradoxes exposed by the theory of distortion:

The identification of a universal “archetype” i.e., repair, and the witness's mental contribution by incorporating the tools and human procedures that she, Marianne, observed when young, on the farm of her father, who would sometimes help several people do repair work on machinery or engine generators. A feature also observed to be very "human" was to fail, repeatedly, when fitting the motor into the object by the humanoids. The whole scene of mechanical aliens, not just an archetypal representation is "something" else. It is something like a kind of "oneiric experience" with physical reality, produced (assembled) by the unconscious of the witness, with the help of unknown intelligences. The interaction of "them" in our psyche, makes the "movie" of Alien repair a product and result of the perfect symbiosis of identifiable archetypes (inherent to all human beings) and the obvious distortion of memory, imagination and knowledge of each person.

The mechanism is very similar (although not equal to) what we experience while dreaming. If you reader find this strange, you should know that every night, while you sleep, your brain recreates all kinds of situations, distorting everyday life experiences; your ability to reason is partly annulled.
The phenomenon of distortion is based on many of these oneiric precepts and unconscious processes of the human mind. If the theory of distortion was the result of a purely mental causes or caused by a physical effect (Persinger’s theory) without the participation of an external agent, the patterns of the apparitions would not contain common elements.

The experience would be much more unique, extravagant and completely disorganized and incoherent. But mostly, those views, mental aberration and/or physical effects, expose a serious error that completely invalidates a global solution of the UFO phenomenon.



They do not explain. Why not?

For example, in some places, UFO landings occurred frequently at certain times and now the "process" is not repeated. But not only in specific locations. Entire nations have exapereinced a decrease of close encounters, and alleged "hallucinations" have not been replaced by another type of anomalous phenomena of perception. Both these hypotheses, mental quirks and Personger’s electromagnetic influence can not be put forward as solutions to the problem UFOs in a general context.

MORE INCIDENT STRANGE MALFUNCTIONS

On numerous occasions, the crews of the UFOs seem to be engaged in the repair of their not so perfect flying saucers.
On September 24, 1954, in Becar (France), two women, Mrs. Geoffrey and Miss Gisele Fin, reported seeing, in a field near their home, a dark gray disk. Along with the object, was a "man" apparently normal, with dark clothes and a sort of "cap" on his head. According to the witnesses, the humanoids were occupied in arduous tasks of repair. (See for comparison, the William Laxton incident, recounted earlier here). But it is not unique.
On October 9, 1954, a draftsman named Willi Hoge, in Rinkerode (Germany), witnessed the landing along the road of a cigar-shaped object. From the UFO four beings descendedl rapidly. They were1.20 meters tall, big-headed, with short, thin legs, that, according to Hoge, were stuffed into "rubber" suits. The beings began, before the astonished gaze of the witness, to repair the object.

In February 1977, in Montana, a Ms. Nielson and another woman observed, at dawn, an elongated object with a dome with a surrounding platform at the bottom.
The UFO was being repaired, on the river, with an instrument that caused sparks such as that seen in welding. The humanoids doing the “repairs” had a height of 1.70 meters, were dressed like skiers, and they walked and worked as if completely normal. (The two friends said they felt no fear at any time.)

On April 20, 1950, a similar incident occurred in Italy. Bruno Facchini, went for a walk after a storm in the town of Abbiate Guazzone, when he observed a strong flare. Approaching the place, he saw a very large object, like a rugby ball, equipped with a ladder of about 7 or 8 meters high. From inside came a soft filtered, green light. Next to the object were several humanoids in diving suits with masks. One of the humanoids was standing on a pneumatic lift. He was "welding" the outside of the artefact. Facchini thought it was a military aircraft in trouble and approached.
But after a short distance, one of the humanoids grunted and the witness, frightened, fled. One of the humanoids pointed an instrument, like a camera and Facchini felt a strong wind.Immediately the humanoids entered into the UFO, and flew off, with the sound of a strong buzz.

The strangest thing about these events is that during the bizarre Air-ship wave of 1896/97, there were episodes of the same faults:
April 12, 1897, at Girard, near Green Ridge (Illinois), a group of miners saw an unknown object land three miles north of Green Ridge and four miles south of Girard. The night machinist's for the Chicago and Alton Railroad, Paul McCrame, stated that he came so close to the artefact he saw a man repairing the machinery. Traces were found over a wide area. The object was elongated like a ship and had a roof and a double canopy. It left, flying north. A curious detail is that the witnesses observed, as the aircraft approached, an emblem on its side like the letter M.
April 14, 1897, Gas City (Ind.). An enormous object landed on the farm of John Rush after provoking a violent stampede of horses and cattle. Six occupants descended from the "object" and began to repair it, before it took off at high speed. (It had almost the identical number of “mechanics” of the Marianne incident ). On April 15, 1897, two laborers, Adolph Winkle and John Rubber, were luckier: they saw a strange object land in a field and conversed with its crew. The crew told them that the arteact had flown from Quincy to Springfield in thirty minutes and was on the ground to make electrical repairs. After the mass sightings of strange "airships" in the late 19th century and beginning of the 20th Century, we have to move to 1934 to find an unknown aerial phenomenon with similar characteristics. In Sweden, mainly, there were sightings of a mysterious "gray airplane" that never came to be identified. And again, we find similar situations: February 7, 1934. Oslo (Norway). From the coastal town of Tromsö came the following telegram: "An unknown plane has crashed or made an emergency landing Monday afternoon at Mount Fager, located in the region of Målselv. The inhabitants of the valley continued to look at the device when it fell on the mountain. The next morning the plane was still there and two men were visible by his side, apparently removing the snow.

Moments later the unit treid to fly off twice but was unsuccessful...
The police chief of Målselv County confirmed the veracity of the message. The accident, or the landing was seen from both sides of the mountain, according to [witness] statements. The witnesses were [credible] people."
The next day, the Norwegian newspaper reported that a Tegna Tidens expedition managed to climb to the top of the mountain to search for remains.
"Farmer Martensson of Fulgleli, said a patrol discovered two parallel grooves in the snow at about 350 meters northwest of the point where the plane had been seen. The tracks measured about 75 cm long and 80 cm wide...The patrol also found footprints around the tracks."
UFOs, Air-Ships, aircraft ghosts, all representing terrestrial and mundane concepts (breakdown, screwdrivers, generators, mechanical, etc.), but transformed and converted into perfect instruments for a "pantomime" close to the world of dreams, by "unknown intelligences" manifested at any time, and, above all, under whatever guise that we ourselves helped build ...[Distortion]



JOSE ANTONIO CARAV@CA