IN THE MIND OF UFOS

An exhaustive analysis of more than 10,000 close encounters with UFOs that offers surprising and disconcerting conclusions never reached before...

It must be taken into account that one of the most serious mistakes made by ufologists has been to consider that the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH) was the only, as well as evident and logical, solution to the enigma before even having all the data and information on the table to, obviously, be able to form a more accurate idea of the paradigm at hand. Also, to top off this initial failed approach, almost all research has been conducted, oriented and even sweetened to "prove" the validity of the visit of alien beings to our planet over any other proposal that dared to stand up to this seductive idea. Trampling over any clue or element that could call into question this belief.

There are a series of complex questions that have never crossed the minds of most ufologists: how can there be so many different types of crew members; why don't flying saucers leave traces in all landings; why in some incidents the occupant of the UFO can speak our language perfectly and in others he babbles in an incomprehensible language; why do the alleged extraterrestrials repeat certain actions ad nauseam over and over again in front of witnesses? Why do we have such different descriptions of the same apparent phenomenon; why do aliens wear scuba suits in one event and not in others; why are many close encounters absurd and nonsensical; where does this link between paranormal phenomena and flying saucers comes from; why does the ufological paradigm have so many things in common with our human society; why do UFOs have so many colored lights if they want to go unnoticed ?

Andres Gomez Serrano, in his book UFOs: 50 years of research in the Campo de Gibraltar (1997), almost poetically stated that UFOs: Thousands of witnesses (millions of them) have seen them, photographed them, filmed them, chased them (with fighter planes), and they have even been shot from the ground and from the air with all kinds of weapons, including missiles, both day and night. Governments are still silent, do not know, do not respond. The most impenetrable mystery accompanied by a persistent silence hangs over this lurid affair. In spite of the fact that in their possession -we only suppose-, there are ample and voluminous dossiers classifying them as "Top Secret or top secret classified matter".

The researcher Félix Arés de Blas stated that: "The UFO phenomenon is a multiple phenomenon. There is a physical phenomenon. There is a physical phenomenon and there is a mythical phenomenon. They are totally differentiated realities, autonomous worlds with few contacts between them. The UFO myth exists and has a life of its own independent of the physical UFO, or with very little relation to the physical UFO

Do you understand now, dear reader, why one premise prevails over the other, who is going to admit the reality of these encounters 63, and is it logical that a partial and biased reading of the data is preferred? One thing is clear. The more information about the UFO phenomenon we have, the more confusion. The closer the proximity, the more the anarchy in the data . And, therefore, our reason must “leave the ship” before facing the deep study of the case reports.

JOSÉ ANTONIO CARAV@CA First Edition: June 2022